Skip to main content

The Myth of Gilgit-Baltistan's Linkage with J&K-II

THE MYTH OF NORTHERN AREAS’ LINKAGE WITH J&K –II (The Muslim dated 30.08.1991) 


The Gilgit Scouts in collusion with Muslim officers of the 6th Jammu and Kashmir Battalion stationed at Bunji as well as on deputation with the Gilgit Scouts organised an uprising. A leading role in organizing this revolution was played by Col Mirza Hassan Khan, a son of the soil of Gilgit. The Gilgit Scouts without any external assistance overthrew the Dogra regime at Gilgit on November 1, 1947 by capturing the State apparatus and arresting the Governor.

After wresting freedom from the Dogras, the provincial government of Gilgit decided to join Pakistan and requested Pakistan to take over the administration of the liberated territories. Acceding to the request of the Provisional Government (De facto Sovereign Body) of Gilgit, the Pakistan government sent Sardar Muhammad Alam on 17th November, 1947 to take over the administration as first Pakistani Political Agent of Gilgit.

The historical narration amply demonstrates that the association between the Northern Areas and the Dogra State of Jammu and Kashmir was not voluntary, rather it was an imposed one. It was a relationship between usurper and vanquished. There was nothing in common between the two except religion of the oppressed subject of the Maharaja. 

Culturally, linguistically and ethnically the two had , and have vast differences. When the vanquished people of the Northern Areas got a chance to get rid of the Dogra yoke they drew it away by armed struggle and regained their natural independence. They undid what they Dogras had done to them.

The people of the area expressed their self-determination for the first time in their history to join Pakistan through the De facto Sovereign Body of the Provisional Government. This Defacto Sovereign Boldy had the mandate of the people which is evident from the enthusiastic support extended to them by the people during the liberation war of 1947-49.

We are rejecting the Indian claim over Kashmir on the ground that it has forcibly occupied the State of Jammu and Kashmir. By the same logic, the Northern Areas cannot be an integral part of the Dogra State of Jammu and Kashmir simply because part of the Northern Areas was forcibly occupied by that State. Major portions of the Northern Areas like Chilas, Hunza, Nagar, Gahkuch, Yasin, Ishkoman and Gupis were occupied by the British themselves and administered directly by the Federal Government.

The British in their numerous documents never considered them as part of Jammu and Kashmir State. Should these areas now form part of Great Britain? Moreover, the tribal territories of Darel and Tangir were neither occupied by the British nor by the Dogra State of Jammu and Kashmir. They joined Pakistan on their own by amalgamating themselves with Gilgit Agency in 1952. By what logic can one consider Darel and Tangir as an integral part of the Jammu and Kashmir State? History is replete with instances where alien forces occupied different nations and when these nations one after another got their independence, they reverted to their original position. The whole process of decolonization and independence of the Indo-Pak sub-continent is a glaring example.

As a matter of fact, the Government of Pakistan in the hope of getting plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir State mistakenly declared the Northern Areas (part and parcel of Pakistan) as disputed territory before the United Nations. The status quo has been maintained for the last 44 years despite the fact that after liberating their area the people of the Northern Areas have unequivocally and unambiguously voted for Pakistan.

The people of the Northern Areas were very clear in their minds about their position. A free people of their own free will joined Pakistan. The description of Northern Areas in the hollow UNCIP Resolutions, the interim nature of the Sino-Pakistan Boundary Agreement of 1962 and mention of the area in the map and census of Jammu and Kashmir State are all sequences of the initial mistake committed by Pakistan and the people of Northern Areas are not a party to it.

These figments of imagination do not change the reality on the ground. An area cannot be part of another country by simply showing it on the map with that country. Had it been so, Jammu and Kashmir State would have been part of India which frequently shows it in its maps.

The people of Northern Areas have rendered more sacrifices for their constitutional rights than those of AJK. In 1950, about 7 people were killed in Punial for demanding political rights. In 1971, one person was killed and several person were sent to Haripur Jail for the same demand at Gilgit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gilgit-Baltistan – A Historical Narrative

BySyed Shamsuddin

Perceptibly, there abound divergent narratives and counter narratives wittingly or unwittingly churned out as to status of Gilgit-Baltistan which more often than not, have no bearing on and are sadly devoid of any substance when put in the correct historical perspective. In order to get the best and clearest possible picture, it becomes imperative to have a full view of and delve deeper into its background with a view to irrefutably place facts connected with the matter in the correct historical order by separating what is called the wheat from the chaff for the information of the readers as follows:
Strictly speaking, the region fell on turbulent times and troublous waters during the second half of the nineteenth century which may, with profit, be called the period of uncertainty and the gloomiest transitional phase in Gilgit-Baltistan’s context. Synoptically, region consisted of and apportioned into a dozen tiny kingdoms each ruled by despotic, independent rulers f…

Foiling India’s Inimical Designs

BySyed Shamsuddin A very interesting summation, aptly encompassing has been going on in Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) overtime in socio-political context, was published in a regional Urdu daily the other day. The learned writer offered a peep into the brief historical background of the region dating to the post-independence period, and referred precisely to what happened preceding the liberation of Gilgit-Baltistan. Beginning with briefly recording of the facts about how the British colonizers packed off by giving back the territory of Gilgit, in August 1947, to the Dogra occupiers, quite intriguingly with the condition that the latter would retain Major William Brown – a British military officer – to assign him the command of Gilgit Scouts. The move was ostensibly aimed at checking effectively and blocking Russo-China contacts, as well as to preclude Gilgit region from the impact of communists inroads into this land.
After the successful revolution of 1st November 1947, Gilgit emerged as a…

Eulogizing The Protectors of Culture and Tradition

BySyed Shamsuddin QUITE PROPITIOUSLY, a flurry of activities is getting underway in the context of revival of Shina language in its original form and diction. This is in addition to the marked efforts afoot to build a consensus among the literary circles formed by Shina speaking communities all across the Shina speaking areas – mostly inhabiting northern Pakistan and part of the Indian held Kashmir- to popularize and universalize a homogenized approach to a unified code aimed at sustaining and preserving this language which is sadly on the wane.
To give a recent example, Shakil Ahmad Shakil carried out a research work culminating in his products like ‘dade shilokeh’ (grandmas’s tales) and Shina Grammar, Aziz-ur-Rehman Malangi’s Shina Diwan and to top them all is Haji Shah Mirza’s translation of the Holy Qura’an into Shina which is greatly contributive to the existing literature in Shina. There is no gainsaying that viewed in terms of it originality of form, diction and etymology, Shin…